Showing posts with label Descartes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Descartes. Show all posts
Monday, 24 March 2014
Where are you?
Where are you? You are in your chest. Researchers “asked ten blindfolded adults to use a metal pointer to motion at ‘themselves.’ Most people indicated their upper torso area … ‘the torso is, so to speak, the great continent of the body, relative to which all other body parts are mere peninsulas. Where the torso goes, the body follows.’
... I wonder whether the ego doesn’t just go wherever you are focusing your attention. When I concentrate on my pinky finger, for instance, it seems to contain more ineffable selfhood than the kneecap I am ignoring. Also, do certain qualities of character lead us to affiliate more strongly with different body parts? Would a jock situate his soul in his bicep? Would a smart, geeky teenager identify as a brain? And, also, what exactly do we mean by “self”? I would certainly place my intellect inside my head; when I’m nervous, I can feel it in my stomach; as a white woman, I often benefit from the color of my skin. I am tempted to table this topic of inquiry as far too nebulous to ever invite the application of the scientific method—but, then again, what do “I” know? I’m just a pair of boobs."
-- Katy Waldman
(Image from The Paris Review. Descartes thought the seat of the soul was in the pineal gland. He was so wrong.)
Tuesday, 21 January 2014
I feel, therefore I am.
According
to Descartes' famous dualist theory, human beings were composed of
physical bodies and immaterial minds. Spinoza disagreed. In ''The
Ethics,'' his masterwork, published after his death in 1677, he argued
that body and mind are not two separate entities but one continuous
substance.
As for Descartes' view of the mind as a reasoning
machine, Spinoza thought that was dead wrong. Reason, he insisted, is
shot through with emotion. More radical still, he claimed that thoughts
and feelings are not primarily reactions to external events but first
and foremost about the body. In fact, he suggested, the mind exists
purely for the body's sake, to ensure its survival.
For his
beliefs, Spinoza was vilified and -- for extended periods -- ignored.
Descartes, on the other hand, was immortalized as a visionary. His
rationalist doctrine shaped the course of modern philosophy and became
part of the cultural bedrock....
Read the full article by Emily Eakin in The New York Times.
Labels:
article,
body,
Descartes,
EMILY EAKIN,
feel,
feelings,
mind,
New York Times,
philosophy,
quote,
Spinoza,
words
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
